By Jeel Patel
Choosing the right framework for your needs can enable faster development cycles and easier maintenance down the road. There are several excellent web frameworks available for Go that can help developers quickly build performant and scalable web services.
When choosing a web framework in Go, the best choice often depends on the specific needs of your project. In this article, we will take a look at some of the top Golang web frameworks. We will explore their key features, advantages, and use cases. Whether you are building REST APIs, web apps, or microservices, these Go web frameworks can help you be productive.
Table of Contents
8 Best Web Frameworks of Golang Programming Language
| Icon | Name | Features | GitHub Stars |
|---|---|---|---|
 |
Gin |
|
72.3k stars |
 |
Echo |
|
26.9k stars |
 |
Beego |
|
30.3k stars |
 |
Revel |
|
13k stars |
 |
Fiber |
|
29k stars |
 |
Buffalo |
|
7.9k stars |
 |
Chi |
|
15.7k stars |
 |
Gorilla |
|
19.4k stars |
Let’s now learn about each of the frameworks of Go in detail.
-
Gin: Golang’s Speedy Web Framework
Gin is one of the top-rated web frameworks in the world of the Go language. Think of it as a tool that helps developers build web stuff that includes from single-page applications to websites, especially with super-fast speed. This framework is easy to use, doesn’t have a lot of unnecessary parts, and comes with many useful features.
Gin framework uses something called the “HTTP router library,” which is why it’s so quick. If you are all about speed and like things simple, Gin might be perfect for you. But if you want all the bells and whistles, it might feel a bit basic.
Let’s learn about the advantages and limitations of the Gin framework.
Advantages and Limitations of the Gin Framework
Advantages Disadvantages Gin provides good performance compared to other Go web frameworks due to optimized routing. Gin lacks built-in support for validation compared to frameworks like Echo. Gin requires less boilerplate code than Gorilla and Net/HTTP for common web application features. Gin has a smaller community than mature frameworks like Express.js and Django. Gin supports parameters in routes for clean REST API interface design. Gin does not include ORM or database abstraction layers like Laravel and Rails. Gin supports data binding request types like JSON to struct models with less code than the standard library. Gin apps often require more lines of code for middleware and auth compared to batteries-included frameworks. Gin provides easy error handling with middleware compared to manually writing error handlers. Gin encourages a global state rather than dependency injection, making testing harder. -
Echo: Golang’s Efficient and Adaptable Web Framework
Echo is a web framework in Go that is efficient, adaptable, and without unnecessary add-ons. At its core, Echo focuses on performing tasks efficiently and giving developers the tools they need without any fluff. For example, Echo allows data rendering to send various HTTP responses at a time in multiple formats like XML, JSON, and HTML.
In short, Echo is designed for developers who want efficiency and adaptability in their toolbox. It’s great for creating fast web services, whether you are building simple APIs or more comprehensive web applications. Let’s learn about the advantages and limitations of the Echo.
Advantages and Limitations of the Echo Framework
Advantages Disadvantages Echo has built-in validation support compared to manually handling validation in Gin. Echo has a slower performance than Gin due to reflection usage. Echo requires less boilerplate code than the stdlib net/http package. Echo and has less control over error handling than Gin’s middleware model. Echo supports auto-binding JSON requests to structs with validation. Echo encourages a global state rather than dependency injection. Echo has better support for testing with dependency injection compared to Gin. Echo has a smaller community than other Go frameworks like Gin. Echo provides customized central HTTP error handling with an easy API. Echo lacks some advanced routing features available in Gin. -
Beego: Golang’s Comprehensive Web Framework
Beego is a web framework in Go that offers an all-in-one solution, much like how Django functions for Python. Beego equips developers with a plethora of tools and features, ranging from web development to Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) and detailed logging mechanisms.
Beego stands out as a feature-rich framework in the Go ecosystem. It’s ideal for developers seeking a comprehensive toolset similar to Django or Rails, encompassing everything from web development to database operations.
Check the following table to learn about the advantages and limitations of the Beego framework.
Advantages and Limitations of the Beego Framework
Advantages Disadvantages Beego has built-in ORM for database access, unlike Gin’s lack of ORM. Beego’s ORM forces SQL-based design instead of NoSQL flexibility. Beego includes baked-in modules like caching and logging. Beego encourages monolithic apps rather than microservices architecture. Beego has auto-binding between requests/responses and structs. Beego’s magic behavior reduces code transparency compared to Gin. Beego has easy internationalization support built in. Beego’s baked-in admin UI is less customizable than hand-rolled. Beego provides configurable conventions for MVC structure. Beego’s fixed conventions reduce flexibility compared to Gin. Beego’s modularity makes it easy to include needed components. Beego lacks advanced routing features available in other Go frameworks. -
Revel: Golang’s Convention-Centric Web Framework
Revel is a high-productivity web framework built specifically for the Go programming language. Introduced in 2012, Revel was one of the first mature and fully-featured frameworks available for Go web development.
Revel aims to make building web applications in Go quicker and easier through its “convention over configuration” design philosophy. Instead of requiring extensive setup and boilerplate code, Revel comes with sensible defaults and pre-built components that follow established conventions.
Revel’s emphasis on convention over configuration also has drawbacks. Experienced developers have less control to customize Revel’s pre-built components. Using Revel also implicitly locks your app architecture to Revel’s conventions, which can complicate swapping out components later.
Learn about the advantages and disadvantages from the following section.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Revel Framework
Advantages Disadvantages Quick and easy to build web apps with Go. The steep learning curve for new Go developers. Hot code reload speeds up development. Immature compared to other options. Good built-in support for REST APIs. Smaller community than alternatives. Focus on high productivity for developers. Limited documentation and tutorials. Integrated with many Go libraries and tools. Not ideal for complex front-end apps. Easy to deploy to various platforms. Opinionated structure locks you in. Strong conventions and structure. Not optimized for HTML-heavy sites. Fast routing and template rendering. Lack of UI components limits options. Avoid boilerplate code with a code generator. – -
Fiber: Golang’s Fast Web Framework with Express.js Flavor
Fiber is a Node.js ecosystem-inspired web framework written in Go. Developers acquainted with Express.js will find Fiber’s architecture and approach quite recognizable. Its foundation on the fast HTTP library ensures high-speed operations, outperforming the standard ‘net/http’ in many scenarios. Let’s now learn about the Fiber framework’s benefits and limitations.
Advantages and Limitations of Fiber Framework
Advantages Disadvantages Fiber provides high-speed performance compared to Node.js and Go frameworks. Fiber has a smaller ecosystem of middleware compared to Express or Gin. Fiber requires less memory usage than Node.js frameworks. This framework lacks built-in ORM or database support, unlike Django or Beego. Fiber enables easy scalability across processes and machines. Fiber has less structured conventions compared to opinionated frameworks. Fiber supports middleware like Express for routing and plugins. There is less flexibility and requires more upfront design decisions. Fiber has minimal boilerplate code for common web app features. Fiber provides less out-of-box functionality than full-stack frameworks. Fiber allows reusable middleware components across projects. Fiber has a smaller community and resources compared to leading frameworks. Fiber offers a high-performance web framework solution for Go developers, especially those with a background in Node and Express.js. This framework combines the familiarity of Express.js with the speed advantages of Go, making it an attractive choice for projects that demand performance. However, developers should be aware of potential compatibility nuances arising from its dependence on fast HTTP.
-
Buffalo: Golang’s Comprehensive Bootstrap Web Framework
Buffalo is a full-stack web development framework for Go that provides integrated tooling for front-end and back-end workflows. With scaffolding, Webpack integration, hot reloading, routing, and ORM support, Buffalo offers an all-in-one solution for building complete web applications and sites in Go. The comprehensive feature set aims to streamline the entire development lifecycle. Now, read the benefits and limitations of the Buffalo framework.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Buffalo Framework
Advantages Disadvantages This framework provides structure and conventions for quick development. Buffalo’s baked-in choices limit flexibility compared to bare Go. Buffalo includes development tools like auto-reload and generators. Buffalo discourages microservices with monolithic structures. Buffalo framework has a robust database ORM and migration built-in. Buffalo’s magic reduces code transparency compared to explicitness. Buffalo makes building modern UIs easy with WebAssembly support. Buffalo’s auto-generated code needs heavy customization. This framework auto-binds requests/responses to struct models. Buffalo has a smaller community than other Go web frameworks. Buffalo simplifies deployments with easy Heroku and Docker support. Buffalo lacks advanced routing capabilities of routers like Chi. Buffalo is ideal for full-stack web apps where integrated front/back-end workflows are valued over framework customizability. The extensive scaffolding accelerates startup, while hot reloading improves iterations. However, its bigger scope also increases learning needs and may not suit smaller projects.
-
Chi: A Lightweight and Fast Router for Go
As a lightweight HTTP router designed specifically for Go, Chi aims to deliver simple, fast, and idiomatic routing without compromising on features. Chi focuses on low memory usage and helps in a routing engine that handles URL matching, request handling, and middleware processing for writing clean and robust web handlers.
Chi excels at providing a lightweight, fast, and idiomatic routing solution for Go apps without unnecessary bloat. For projects wanting robust routing without a complex framework, Chi is an excellent choice.
Chi offers a powerful routing syntax for strict and flexible URL matching and an elegant middleware chaining system for extendable handler logic. By focusing on its compact routing core, Chi can achieve high performance and low overhead.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Chi Framework
Advantages Disadvantages This framework provides fast HTTP routing in Go. Lacks some advanced features of larger frameworks. Chi is a minimalistic framework with zero memory allocation, which results in high-end performance. For advanced development of apps, you might need external libraries. This framework supports many built-in middlewares that are chaining easily. The learning curve for beginners in web development. Built-in support for net/context package. Fewer community plugins compared to Echo, and Gin. Enables the creation of modular high-performance REST APIs. Documentation might seem sparse for some users. -
Gorilla: Golang’s Modular Web Toolkit
Gorilla stands out as a versatile toolkit for web developers working with Go, rather than a monolithic framework. It’s built on a principle of modularity, allowing developers to cherry-pick functionalities based on their project requirements, ensuring lean and optimal implementations. Gorilla serves as an efficient toolkit for Go web developers who value flexibility and modularity. It’s particularly suited for projects where a lean approach, devoid of unnecessary components is desired. Let’s learn about the benefits and limitations of the Gorilla framework.
Advantages and Limitations of Gorilla Web Framework
Advantages Disadvantages Gorilla is modular, pick what components you need. The steeper learning curve for new developers. Stable with a proven track record in the Go community. The community is active but smaller than some counterparts. Rich set of middleware and tools available. An initial setup may be more complex than simpler frameworks. Seamless integration with Go’s native net/http. – Strong emphasis on maintainability and scalability. –
Want to Hire Golang Developers for Your Web Project?
Brief your project requirements to us. We provide skilled and experienced Golang web developers who are adept at creating scalable solutions.
This is all about the top Golang web frameworks that help you from server implementations to rapid development. Each Go programming language web framework helps you to fulfill your unique requirements.
Do you have doubts regarding the Golang web framework? Check the following FAQ section to get answers.
Want to Build a Web Project with Golang?
Let’s talk. We are a leading web development company, having experienced web developers, designers, engineers, and project managers.
FAQ About Golang Web Frameworks
-
How to choose the best Golang web framework for your project
Consider your project requirements, use of programming languages, and development speed. Gin is great for APIs, Beego for backend services, Revel for complex web apps, and Buffalo for rapid prototyping. Evaluate each framework’s features, community adoption and documentation fit. Testing out a small project can help choose the right framework.
-
What factors should you consider when selecting a Golang web framework?
Here is the list of the factors that you need to consider when selecting a Golang web framework.
The size and complexity of your project
- Size and complexity – Choose a framework that matches the app’s scope and features
- Speed of development – Look for quick learning, good docs and community
- Feature requirements – Align required and offered features
- Scalability needs – Ensure the framework can readily scale
- Community support – An active community aids in troubleshooting
- Maintenance needs – Pick a framework with longevity and resources
- Ease of use – Prioritize simple, intuitive frameworks to build faster
- Performance – Benchmarks matter if speed is critical
- Testing utilities – Built-in testing support accelerates delivery
You need to prioritize what matters most for building and supporting your web app or service.
-
How to evaluate the features between different Golang frameworks
- Examine routing, middleware, and built-ins to see if they meet project needs.
- Compare request/response handling, and a template engine if building web apps.
- Check ORM, authentication, and caching support match requirements.
- Focus on specific features needed rather than unnecessary bloat.
- Select a framework with excellent execution on capabilities that address your use case.
Choose the Best Golang Web Framework for Your Project
Golang’s rising popularity for building robust and scalable web applications and services has given rise to a vibrant ecosystem of web frameworks. As we have seen, developers are spoiled for choice when selecting a Go framework best suited for their needs.
Lightweight routing-focused frameworks like Chi and Gin are great choices when you want speed, flexibility, and control without a lot of added bloat. For full-stack solutions, Buffalo and Beego provide batteries-included tooling for end-to-end web app development. Frameworks like Echo and Revel aim to maximize developer productivity with their unique takes on request handling and templating.
While there is no single “best” Golang web framework universally, understanding your specific requirements around features, performance, productivity and long-term maintenance will inform the ideal choice. Evaluating options like routing approach, bundled libraries, community vigor, documentation quality and ease of debugging are helpful comparison points.
By judiciously aligning project needs to framework capabilities, Go developers can benefit from the diverse and innovative web framework solutions available. The versatility of Go’s framework ecosystem empowers you to ship robust web apps and services efficiently.
All our projects are secured by NDA
